LCR Lovers/Haters

north country gal · 02-16-2013, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry_P

I have a the 38 Spl version of the LCR and am thinking of trading it on a Smith 642 when I get back home. I am also considering the 340PD but the price may make me rethink that one.

As to the LCR I have had a couple of trigger reset issues which were common with the early models. It is accurate and the trigger is excellent but it is a carry piece and the couple of issues creates doubt. I like the weight because it is exclusively for pocket carry but it is just butt ugly. My thoughts are unless you plan to pocket carry then get an SP101.

+1 Also makes it into the house under my ugly rule - barely, but I could let it in the door.

Machinist · 02-16-2013, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RetiredSeabee

Why is she wearing a cat on her head?

Terry_P · 02-16-2013, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by north country gal

+1 Also makes it into the house under my ugly rule - barely, but I could let it in the door.

My SP has the grips with the inserts and I bought a set of Jim's (41 Magnum) panels and it dressed it up nicely.

Sightngrl · 02-16-2013, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machinist

BWAHAHAHAHA

Kitty's got

LOLOL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCJux_7W2i8

Nutty Ned · 02-20-2013, 02:31 PM

Lcr makes a good back up or inclement weather gun, it is not to be
seen until used.

bearcatter · 08-15-2015, 12:25 PM

Late to the party, but I just joined and found this thread. Hello, Sightngrl !! I've missed your wit since I left the "other forum".....

.....

I have the .357 for carry, and the .22 for practice and fun.

I'm a bit of a dinosaur, so I barely live with the grip frames being plastic. At least the main frames are metal. I would like the .22 better if it's frame was stainless like the .357, and I'd like both better with a brushed finish instead of the black coatings. The .22's coating is more fragile than what's on the .357, and it's a royal pain cleaning around the forcing cone without scraping the coating.

I do like the triggers. The .357's is the best I've ever felt on a snub. I got lucky with my .22 and got a good trigger. It seems to be only a couple pounds heavier than the .357. It was the best of three in the store, and better than any I tried after.

08-15-2015, 12:25 PM	#26
bearcatter Senior Member Joined: Aug 2015 From: Virginia Posts: 4,021	Late to the party, but I just joined and found this thread. Hello, Sightngrl !! I've missed your wit since I left the "other forum".......... I have the .357 for carry, and the .22 for practice and fun. I'm a bit of a dinosaur, so I barely live with the grip frames being plastic. At least the main frames are metal. I would like the .22 better if it's frame was stainless like the .357, and I'd like both better with a brushed finish instead of the black coatings. The .22's coating is more fragile than what's on the .357, and it's a royal pain cleaning around the forcing cone without scraping the coating. I do like the triggers. The .357's is the best I've ever felt on a snub. I got lucky with my .22 and got a good trigger. It seems to be only a couple pounds heavier than the .357. It was the best of three in the store, and better than any I tried after.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Gunner Forum Discussions
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
.22 Lovers....	sheepdog	Ammunition	5	03-11-2009 02:30 PM

LCR Lovers/Haters

best double action revolver 2012

best mods for lcr

guns without a hammer

lcr forum

lcr forums

lcr mods

lcr vs 642

ruger lcr forum

ruger lcr mods

ruger lcr recall

s&w 642

smith wesson carry in.pocket guns

02-20-2013, 02:31 PM	#25
Nutty Ned Senior Member Joined: Jan 2012 From: NC Posts: 580	Lcr makes a good back up or inclement weather gun, it is not to be seen until used.