The New Ruger MK IV Rimfire Pistol

north country gal · 10-06-2016, 09:04 AM

Checked with both our local gunships and neither of them even knew there was a Mark IV. Might be awhile before I even see one, but no hurry on this one.

bearcatter · 10-06-2016, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by north country gal

Checked with both our local gunships and neither of them even knew there was a Mark IV. Might be awhile before I even see one, but no hurry on this one.

I haven't seen one yet, either. I'm reading too many issues with it, so I may not bother to fondle one, since I'm not buying anyway. Most of the Rugers I've handled in the last few years have not been up to their former fit and finish.

I have felt very fortunate with my SP-101, made in 2015, that Gallery Of Guns sent me a good one. Fit and finish is as good as my Bearcats from 2011. All of the .22 SPs that I've handled since weren't as good on fit, especially the crane area, and lots of tool marks. Most have uneven cylinder lockup, with at least two chambers loose. More than a few over-torqued barrels, too.

RidgeRunner · 10-06-2016, 12:23 PM

What issues are you hearing about the IV?

bearcatter · 10-07-2016, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RidgeRunner

What issues are you hearing about the IV?

See my post #20, three posts below. Some aren't a big deal, some might be. Some just personal preferences.

north country gal · 10-07-2016, 05:28 PM

Surprise, surprise! I saw a MKIV Hunter at our local shop, today. Price was $615.

Yes, there are obvious differences, but the gun looked pretty good, overall. Didn't try the take down feature because I'm really not interested in the gun. Why? The only two functional differences between the IV and the III that I could see are the take down feature and no LCI on the IV. Neither of those is an issue for me and I already have the MKIII Hunter. Interesting gun, but can't find an excuse to add one to the Marks I already have.

Danwin22 · 02-23-2019, 04:15 PM

I can’t get excited over the MK-IV because it has a cast frame instead of the familiar smooth blued steel on my MK-II and MK-III.

Taking the earlier MK versions apart or putting it back together has never been an issue for me and there are many videos that show how.

The MK-II is by far my favorite but the MK-I is also nice and the MK-III can be back dated to eliminate superfluous features.

bearcatter · 02-24-2019, 07:51 AM

The stainless Mark IV is a stainless steel frame. The "blued" is aluminum. 22/45s are still plastic.

I found a good article and photos about all Ruger Mark pistol frames:

https://www.wirthweinguns.com/Ruger-Frames.php

RidgeRunner · 02-25-2019, 03:33 PM

I am curious to see if they introduce a Government Target Model MK-IV.

bearcatter · 02-26-2019, 06:46 AM

Is there a real performance difference between a Government and the Mark IV Competition?

RidgeRunner · 02-26-2019, 10:15 AM

I don't know. I own a MK III Government Target and would like a MKIV to compliment.
More sensual than practical.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Gunner Forum Discussions
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Ruger Mark II Standard in stainless	north country gal	Range Reports	19	06-07-2017 06:39 AM
First edition Ruger SP101 22LR	north country gal	Range Reports	9	09-06-2016 06:19 AM
The CZ 75 & Ruger Charger pistol range report.	moakes58	Range Reports	34	07-17-2016 05:51 AM
Mini Single Six, the Ruger Bearcat	north country gal	Range Reports	8	06-24-2016 03:50 PM

The New Ruger MK IV Rimfire Pistol

base for ruger mk4 22lr semi auto pistol

does ruger have a mk 5 pistol in the making

ruger mark 4 target forum

ruger mark iv forum

ruger mk 4

ruger mk iv forums

ruger mk4

ruger mk4 pistol

ruger mk4 review

ruger mk4 target

ruger mkiv

ruger mkiv 22/45 target forums

10-06-2016, 09:04 AM	#21
north country gal Senior Member Joined: Jan 2013 From: northern wisconsin Posts: 6,001	Checked with both our local gunships and neither of them even knew there was a Mark IV. Might be awhile before I even see one, but no hurry on this one.

10-06-2016, 12:23 PM	#23
RidgeRunner Senior Member Joined: Nov 2015 From: Buck Ridge, Georgia Posts: 3,430	What issues are you hearing about the IV?

10-07-2016, 05:28 PM	#25
north country gal Senior Member Joined: Jan 2013 From: northern wisconsin Posts: 6,001	Surprise, surprise! I saw a MKIV Hunter at our local shop, today. Price was $615. Yes, there are obvious differences, but the gun looked pretty good, overall. Didn't try the take down feature because I'm really not interested in the gun. Why? The only two functional differences between the IV and the III that I could see are the take down feature and no LCI on the IV. Neither of those is an issue for me and I already have the MKIII Hunter. Interesting gun, but can't find an excuse to add one to the Marks I already have.

02-24-2019, 07:51 AM	#27
bearcatter Senior Member Joined: Aug 2015 From: Virginia Posts: 3,926	The stainless Mark IV is a stainless steel frame. The "blued" is aluminum. 22/45s are still plastic. I found a good article and photos about all Ruger Mark pistol frames: https://www.wirthweinguns.com/Ruger-Frames.php

02-25-2019, 03:33 PM	#28
RidgeRunner Senior Member Joined: Nov 2015 From: Buck Ridge, Georgia Posts: 3,430	I am curious to see if they introduce a Government Target Model MK-IV.

02-26-2019, 06:46 AM	#29
bearcatter Senior Member Joined: Aug 2015 From: Virginia Posts: 3,926	Is there a real performance difference between a Government and the Mark IV Competition?

02-26-2019, 10:15 AM	#30
RidgeRunner Senior Member Joined: Nov 2015 From: Buck Ridge, Georgia Posts: 3,430	I don't know. I own a MK III Government Target and would like a MKIV to compliment. More sensual than practical.